Saturday, October 3
Review of essay D#6HW#3
I didn't find this piece very interesting. However, I like how he used progression through history in his paper. It was a cool to see how things progressed through time. It is a nice layout of the paper which I might consider using in my own. It is a little bit of an example of what we are doing for WP#3, however it didn't cover all of he criteria. He never said how he was going to use these sources in his paper or even how they applied to his paper. This wasn't in an annotated bibliography format at all. If I was going to revise it, I would tell what my resources are and how I would use them in my paper.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'll agree with you, that paper was lame. It got to the point though. Seriously though, he messed up on not putting all the bits and pieces. agreed on the changes.
ReplyDeleteIt's just a big redo paper! Although I did enjoy reading about how distance learning came about. I remember those correspondence classes being talked about when I was a little girl! But this paper needs a lot of information to make it fit into the criteria that we were given.
ReplyDelete