Peer reviews D#5 HW#4

This is the first paper i peer reviewed:
http://klindenberg.blogspot.com/2009/09/d4-hw9-rough-draft-wp1.html?showComment=1253927277736#c3874602272790746836
and the second
http://andrescox.blogspot.com/2009/09/d4-hw9-wp1-draft.html?showComment=1253929894542#c1319497494626068216
After reading other peoples drafts and reviewing them, I learned that the easiest way to review is to write notes as you go along, and not to look at just mistakes, but to look at the content as well. For my own draft, I need to add how i am going to conduct research as well as to add descrpitive words to my paper. I also learned that it is important to tell the author when you are confused about something and give comments on how they might make their paper better. If we only said good things about each others paper, we wouldn't know what needs to be fixed. Summer reviewed my paper and had alot of questions. The only problem is that i planned on answering her questions in the research paper itself, but i think i might state this in my paper, just so everyone will want to read it. SHe id however, give me some more ideas of what to write about in my paper, with what she wanted to know more about. My report was only a 1% match. This is because it is a common virus and a lot of people have to explain what it is after they put in a name people wont recognize. However, i do have some editing to do before i turn my paper in. I will probably add some more to it to clear up questions people might have.